Honcho honcho

_20160127_150154

Rod Mauby Newman, like the boat drink although this is a beer and wind and tree bar

I met Rod Newman in front of 235 1st Street in Los Altos, and he gave me a quick tour of his work in progress Honcho Bar. He

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Satchmo under the Geary

teachoutedelsteinperloff

Writer Terry Teachout, director Gordon Edelstein & artistic director of ACT Carey Perloff, under the Geary Street Theatre, opening night, 2016

I’m working past thinking of “Satchmo at the Waldorf” as a take-down of both Louis Armstrong and his agent Joe Glaser. It starts with the Satchmo character admitting that he just crapped his pants, literally. The big revelation is  not only that agent Glaser cheated his client but he did so because he was being blackmailed by the mob.

At a certain level, it does promote the musician and the scene, and is a great showcase for John Douglas Thompson, who plays both of those guys, plus Miles Davis. (It reminds me of Anna Deavere Smith, but also Robert Dinero in “King of Comedy” and the parallax view of how we see Rupert and how Rupert sees himself).

Terry my Terry and I sat in front of direct Gordon Edelstein on opening night, and heard him speak at a reception. He told me that he was just here for the week, then back to New Haven, (where he has been honcho of Long Wharf since 2002). The show runs thru Feb. 7, which I notice is just short of overlapping with the Pollstar Live concert business convention.

To flesh out my reaction, I also bought Terry Teachout’s book, “Pops: A Life of Louis Armstrong” (Houghton Mifflin, 2009, New York). Terry my Terry (aka Terry Acebo Davis), ambushed Teachout in his seat and got him to sign my book — she said it was my birthday. His kind inscription: To Mark — Happy birthday from a fellow blogger Terry Teachout 1-16.

There’s also Words on Plays, Vol. XXII, No. 4 which is a booklet put out by the producers to help promote the shows, 48 pages and the program, which has some of the same material. Ok, well, the Teachout book lists roughly 200 more books in the “select bibliography”, plus he apparently discussed all this with Ted Gioia, who is super smart (and a decent pianist, or so I’ve heard, or not heard — Ted Gioia, brother of Dana Gioia, whose poetry is set to song by Helen Sung, whose cousin married my former business partner, if co-editing the high school rag is business).

One of my notes, and not that anyone wants my notes, is that early on Armstrong (Thompson) describes his wife “brown sugar” and then goes on to say he “brought my horn around to various cities” and I hear “whore-in[g]” as in consorting with professionals, probably not a deliberate pun, or it’s just me. In Teachout book version, he notes that he has consulted with the “650” tapes that the star created to document his life, and I note that that particular number I use as a geographic reference, as in the Peninsula is 650 and SF is 415 — actually Herb Caen used to play this game, about the difference between 415 and 408 (San Jose), but I digress. (I’ll try to update with a page reference — Teachout by the way is also drama critic for Wall Street Journal and claims he played jazz bass in Kansas City, MO for 15 years before his writing career kicked in, and that fact, his musical prowess distinguishes his book about Pops from numerous others, such as that by Gary Giddins, who must not be a musician).

I also thought of experiences with two former clients, Jack Walrath (trumpet player, and an expert on Mingus) and Henry Butler (piano, from New Orleans). Managing a club sized act for a short time gives a scintilla of insight into working with a collosus like Louis Armstrong (which I am pronouncing, in my head, “Louis” and not “Lou-ee” because he is not French or Creole).

A little off topic there is “Inside Llewyn Davis” which depicts a fictional folk artist, 1961 and his manager-contender, based on Bob Dylan’s actual manager, Albert Grossman. (The film is by the Jewish team known as The Coen Brothers, although in that film neither Llewyn Davis nor Oscar Isaac are; in a certain way I started to think of Teachout/Edelstein on Louis Armstrong’s Jewishness as like a shaggy dog story coda to Adam Sandler’s famous holiday song “but his agent is”).

Is it good or bad that if I were asked to book this, like a traveling show, me as a buyer, promoter I would call about five people to see what they think?  I have my ideas, but even better I know people with really good ears and deep, deep knowledge bases.

This is more gossipy than insightful, but I overheard Edelstein tell his actual party that the man next to him was his friend Basil Twist the world’s greatest puppeteer.

edit to add: when I say “Geary” in the headline, do I mean 450 Geary, as in the address of the Theatre — and the room under is actually sometimes referred to as “Fred” for a donor, where the picture was taken — or 38 Geary, as in the muni bus as in they threw the guy under the bus, or I am?

andand: I found this vinyl record just last week — I was looking for David Bowie — in my crate, which now includes a handful of items from my dad’s collection. I noted in the liner notes that the marquee of the 1947 show says “by arrangement with Joe Glaser”:

Satchmo at Symphony Hall

satchmo

3. It says here on ABC booking home page that Forrest Whitaker is starring and directing a biopic on Louis Armstrong, based on the version of his life told by Oscar Cohen who was Joe Glaser’s assistant and succeeded him as Satchmo’s agent when Glaser died in 1969.{Ok, that was from 2008, and in 2013 the L.A. Times –in Los Angeles– noted that the movie was slowly gestating. I don’t know how often ABC updates its site — I also found an interview with Lisa Cohen about the firm, Oscar’s daughter — in the years, late 1990s that I was booking twice-a-month club shows into the Cubberley Auditorium, I was dealing with about 75 agencies and do not recall if I ever randomly called or was called by ABC.

4. jazz writer Gary Giddins who I mention in passing and “Satchmo at the Waldorf” director Gordon Edelstein are both graduates of Grinnell College, in the 1970s. In the remarks it was said that this is the eighth theatre to mount the show, I believe that means all with Thompson.

5. As I said above, I have a weird take, given my small-fish role in the (Palo Alto) music community. Two other filters are my obsession with David Shields (“Reality Hunger”) especially on autobiography and the blurring of truth and fiction, and “Passing Strange” the fictionalized Broadway version of the fast-talking and world-wandering black rocker Mark “Stew” Stewart, also a former client, and come to think of it I do recall name-dropping him or it when “Passing Strange” was at Berkeley Rep, or just after and Carey Perloff was schmoozing with us small-timers in the lobby after “Blood Knot” — we also discussed the upcoming gig at ACT for my friend Madigan Shive.

6. And again, even as a footnote I’m off topic but sussing around on this topic — compared to either thinking about the work per se or reading “Pops” — has me wondering about Langston Hughes poem about the Waldorf-Astoria from 1931. Also, and this is sort of a humble brag, the Waldorf salad was always fruity but like Plastic Alto soon went nuts.

Posted in ethniceities, jazz, sf moma, where yat | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

This dust of birds

Werner Herzog appears on stage at16029-herzog_news.jpgStanford Feb 2 to discuss his favorite book, about peregrine falcons. No word yet on what type of gastro stunt he will simultaneously endeavor.I’m liking the new Bird Dog, on Ramona roasting up a leather football from Shinola, on ham.

edit to add it: The book he will be discussing is by Baker. J.A. Baker, written in the 1960s but just now picking up speed as a cultural pollstar. Initially as the topic appeared to me it was suggested that Baker was a mysterious figure, about whom we knew little but these words, about the birds – -and hence I thought of Wiltsee — but now, or as of 2011, we seem to have a more complete picture. To wit: In 2011, Collins published a new edition of The Peregrine [2] which also included The Hill of Summer and extracts from his diaries. The book includes an introduction by Mark Cocker and notes by John Fanshawe. Prior to this book, little was known about Baker’s personal life but this has now changed. He was born on 6 August 1926 and lived in Chelmsford, Essex. He secondary education was at King Edward VI Grammar School, Chelmsford His books are based largely on his observations of birds in the Essex countryside especially in the area from Chelmsford to the coast. He was unable to drive (despite working for the Automobile Association) and travelled by bicycle. From around 1970 he suffered from severe rheumatoid arthritis and contracted cancer as a result of the drugs taken to alleviate the arthritis. He died on 26 December 1987. (from wiki)

2. Felstiner, on Wiltsee: is “this dust of words” sic a phrase used by Wiltsee, then Felstiner and then Rose?

3. wiltsee lived at “toad hall” on Bryant Street, near the creek??? I wonder where exactly this was.

Posted in media, words | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

What role did super-model play in Palo Alto council approval of flawed redevelopment plan, 1050 Page Mill?

developerasset

Supermodel Kate Upton as seen in famous Super Bowl ad for video game

 

You heard of, if you are at all literary or cultured, “the face that launched a thousand ships”*, but what about the super-model goddess archetype that may or may not explain Palo Alto subsidizing developers to the tune of thousands of dollars worth of fudging in Monday’s council meeting?

 

Council voted 7-1 to approve a deal that would re-build an office building at 1050 Page Mill Road in the former Stanford Industrial Park despite numerous residentialist objections to the deal for matters such as toxics and traffic gridlock. The land is owned by Stanford, but ground-leased to Peter Pau’s Sand Hill Properties, who have a deal with Machine Zone, a video game unicorn whose main source of income is a flashy, violent and manipulative cash cow video game called “Game of War”.

Forbes reporting says that the game was generating $1M per day and $600 M per year, fueled by  racy Super Bowl ad featuring supermodel Kate Upton. The ad campaign cost an estimated $40 million. Upton also appears in the game as a Vanna White-type character that seduces addicts into tapping their credit card for “patches” to the otherwise free game.

 

The building previously housed 200 engineers from Beckman (they make centrifuges and devices, founded here in 1954 but moved to Fullerton in 2009) and Facebook for two years, according to the Weekly. With under-grounded parking (Alison Koo of Pau’s office insists that the garage is above but not in the toxic plume) the facility will likely host more than 1,000 gamers and their ilk. Overall, Stanford Research Park comprises 700 acres, hosts 150 companies and 20,000 workers and recently has seen the selling of leaseholds for in excess of $5 million per acre. Pau bought the ground lease on this site in 2013 for $130 M, according to the Business Journal sources. Pau’s website actually lists four active projects within the Stanford micro-market, although they are best known here for Edgewood Plaza, where the City is, in contrast, threatening to fine them for not having a supermarket as part of the mixed-use deal.

koo

SHP’s Allison Koo

As a former ad agency intern and junior copywriter, whose first industry task was to analyze children’s ads for their latent messages (and this shortly after getting an A+ from Dartmouth’s Blanche Gelfant for a thesis tracing the use of the word “crack” in in Henry Roth’s “Call it Sleep”) I wonder if the Kate Upton ad even subconsciously and subtly explains how Greg Scharff, Marc Berman and Pat Burt could overlook all the problems with this deal.

Meanwhile the Palo Alto Weekly deleted (after three minutes) my first take on this:

How many of them voted for this cuz they thought they would get to meet Kate Upton?

WEEKLYDELETEDCOMMENTJAN2106

Cheeky yes, but why censored? How now, BJ Bill Johnson?

I think someone should break down in strict Keynsian terms the pros and cons from Palo Alto’s perspective what it means that Stanford Cleavage Park is so suck sex full?

Leland and Jane Stanford disapproved of drinking beer — why would they approve the tenancy of video game pimps?

The semiotics are compelling. When Stanford’s Tiffany Griego stands up and says “we are not the applicant here” they are still lending their imprimatur and influence to the case.

I’m not suggesting we condemn the whole damn 700 acres — I’m just saying let’s regulate not salivate.

HER LIPS SUCK FORTH MY SOUL

I mean, yeah I could ask or text each of these guys if they were thinking of Kate Upton with their vote and log their various responses. But yes I think the above screen-capture of Miss Kate as a developer asset should be part of the record that explains this impressive new proposed erection. Or as George Carlin and not (*) Christopher Marlowe might say our thrust is to prick the bubble of the developers and restore our Democracy as one-person, one-vote and not two-tittie one-unicorn or to whatever this has de-evolved.

Tom Dubois (an ally) recused himself from this vote (because his wife works at Stanford), but I’m curious what he thinks about Machine Zone since he is a consultant in the video game field. Meanwhile, shouldn’t Greg Scharff also have recused since he owns an office building nearby off California Avenue?

Activist and Palo Alto citizen Jeff Levinsky rightly compared this deal to the infamous and Grand Jury reported 27 University case wherein City staff and council (including the aforementioned Burt and Scharff) met secretly with developers and Stanford interests months before discussing it from the dias (and spending $250 K in taxpayers money to fluff it out).  The Research Park, the hospital, the shopping center are all unique cases wherein Stanford the rhinoceros and Palo Alto the oxpecker have a joint interest, but I think we tend to get the dubious end of the deal.

I’m just rhapsodizing here but given the context it is fair to ask if there is was anything more overt than the power of the media and sleazy sexploitation to explain council’s action here, and their apparent dereliction in duty and abandonment of local interests.

edit to add: mainly I admit to being more pedantic than erudite and so as to ping my former professor James Shapiro, here is Christopher Marlowe (1604) on Faust and Helen of Troy:

“Was this the face that launch’d a thousand ships,And burnt the topless towers of Ilium–Sweet Helen, make me immortal with a kiss.–”[kisses her]”Her lips suck forth my soul: see, where it flies!–Come, Helen, come, give me my soul again.Here will I dwell, for heaven is in these lips, And all is dross that is not Helena.”

andand:

griego

COME PLAY WITH ME: Since 2007, she has successfully negotiated and executed more than 40 transactions, yielding more than a half-billion dollars in income to Stanford University. She has executed leases covering more than 5,000,000 square feet of office and R&D space. (SVBJ, 2015) — we should figure out how many of these involved dubious council rulings.

Griego narrates this helpful but less titilating backgrounder:

3. Here is a lift from Tiffany Griego’s LinkedIn profile: Lead strategic planning, development and management of the world-renowned Stanford Research Park, Stanford’s preeminent real estate asset and Silicon Valley’s single largest real estate complex. This 700-acre, $7 Billion submarket is comprised of 10.3 Million square feet of improved R&D and office buildings, with Stanford’s direct holdings equaling $2 Billion AUM. Note that their declared assets under management roughly speaking is ten times Palo Alto’s overall annual budget ($200 M). Stanford recently lobbied to be excluded from Palo Alto’s office cap, which itself is a huge cave-in from the 1998-2010 downtown cap and moratorium.

4. Robert Kolker of Bloomsberg profiles Gabriel Leydon of Machine Zone.

5. (a month later) VentureBeat reports that MachineZone spent $62 million in media on the Kate Upton video (in various edits) and $90 overall, in an industry that spent $630 on advertising, a huge jump over the previous year.

6. Super Duper

Regarding above comment, activists and engaged citizens Bill Ross, Doria Summa, Fred Balin and Jeff Levinsky claim that staff and council ruled generously toward allowing 31,000 square feet of new building beyond normal so when I directly above reference Christopher Marlowe and Helen of Troy (and Faust), a more accurate phrasing would be “thousands of thousands of dollars worth of fudging” which is to say we gave away 31 millions in subsidy to Stanford/Pau/Leydon, at least.

Posted in filthy lucre, Plato's Republic, sex | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Huzzah for the new bully pulpit

1
bully

2.

bully meaning good

bully meaning good

Item one is a screen capture of a six-word curse I posted on Palo Alto Weekly online in reaction to Pat Burt, who I consider a bully, i.e. borderline violent and near out-of-control, being elected mayor, although it also references Teddy Roosevelt and a book I hope to read by Doris Kearns Goodwin. “Bully” at the time also meant “good”; a bully pulpit was a good place from which to try to shape society, in the case of Teddy, perhaps pushing back against large companies and advancing worker rights.

Item two is from something I shot a couple hours ago at Bell’s Books, a display in the poetry section, a newsclipping I presume found folded into an old book about poet Carl Sandburg giving a lecture or performance with guitar I think in Illinois. He died in 1967.
File under “media” “words” “platos republic” and see also previous about “Deep Turkey, Tomsula and the Turk”.

3. edit to add: i am being ironic or disingenuous or sarcastic in that I am not cheering but raspberrying (but not sandburgering, or am i?) about pat burt being mayor. also, he is not “new” but “old mayor” to be elected, a retread. a regression or back-slide.

Posted in Plato's Republic, words | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

‘Deep Turkey’, Tomsula and The Turk

Although previous posts reference Russia and India, my first thought was “deep Turkey”

The headline in today’s Palo Alto Weekly (online) says “Pat Burt Returns to The Mayor’s Chair” and so far of the 24 posts, two-thirds are upset about this (ok, now its 17 out of 31, closer to half, expressing alarm or cynicsm, regret or anger- Ed). My little one-liner, which believe me, is pulling my punches, is only viewable to logged-in and registered users, which I consider a type of censorship. (That and the fact that, despite posting under my own name, about 20 percent of my comments are deleted from this forum). I first met Pat Burt in 2009, after declaring for the council race and he quickly established the fact that he could care less about my citizen’s engagement or worse considers me a threat. (And if you read this blog, or search above, you can see my coverage of such).

Rather than the two or three other things I was planning to do, think about or write about*, that the Weekly hid my comments sent me on the war-path, for two hours, or until I realized I needed to move my car.

Check back to see if I update or polish this. I also texted last night a link to another post, about Schimid’s chances for mayor: I said I wondered how the “horse-trading” could have been accomplished without violating the Brown Act.

 

Due to violations of our terms of use (link) comments from this poster are only visible to registeredusers. Click here to view comment. Why? (Yes, Bill Johnson, why the fuck do you censor my posts? You should be paying me! In fact, you owe me money on some football coverage of mine you printed, but that’s beside the point).

This is a bit of a meta-comment, but apparently there is no freedom of the press in Turkey, either.
Web Link

(I searched “freedom of press” and “turkey” and found a website that gave them a 65 out of 100 scale and said “not considered free speech”, still a bit obscure, but why do we censor it here?)

“Deep Turkey” my previous post, the one that is semi-censored (you have to be logged in to view it) references a well-discussed phenomenon that the country Turkey, in the middle east, has an apparent disconnect between what its policy-makers say and do and what actually happens; the argument is that there is an obscure “deep” element that makes decisons behind the scene; I’ve never been to Turkey but I heard about this on public radio and I tend to believe it. So in comparing the election of Pat Burt to mayor, and the persistence and resilience of a pro-Development ethos despite the supposed rise of “new Residentialism” I am comparing our system to another compromised Democracy, 8,000 miles away.

And I am also saying, in the meta -case that it is debatable what role the Palo Alto Weekly plays in the furtherance of this pro-developer bias. For example, PAW supports Pat Burt and does not support me. Fair enough. But why does the Weekly consistently delete my comments or censor them by making the average reader unable to see them?

And to the exact point, Bill Johnson personally defended his censoring of a post I made in 2014^ challenging Pat Burt’s credentials and or conduct as Council, and his role in what became the topic of the Grand Jury report. He said (in a phone conversation) “I will not print the unsubstantiated claims of his political opponent” even though, as I pointed out, he prints numerous comments on that issue wherein he has not even identified the identity of the poster.

Anyhow good luck to Pat.

Courage.

My first reaction, before I read the posts, above about India (by CL) and Russia, was to say that Pat Burt is like the Jim Tomsula of government, while Greg Schmid is like a Bill Walsh.

There’s also “The Turk” the famous chess-playing automaton. But that does not remind me of Pat in the least zugzwang bit.

and1:

Here is Cheryl’s post:

Soon there will be 4 seats open for city council. I hope the voters in Palo Alto will understand the importance of selecting slow growth candidates to shape the Palo Alto we hope to live in.

Consider Dholera, India. (A new planned city)

Web Link

Just like here, (and clearly on a vastly larger scale) the Dholera plans reflect the new urbanism ideology: an effort to create a new environment that is green, livable and business friendly. You should check out this youtube because it’s representative of what very well funded “new urbanism” looks like, on a large scale. This could be the Silicon Valley of the future, and I’m curious whether anyone–besides corporations, developers, and architects– feel enthusiasm for this vision. (You may want to turn off the sound unless you love techno beats.)

And, if it’s not a future you want, it’s important that you pay close attention to what happens this year, and help people get elected who represent the future you’d prefer.

2. and kudos to this anonymous post-er (“Short memory…”) who reminded us that when Karen Holman was elected over Liz Kniss, that the vote was 5-4 for vice mayor with Greg Schmid over Pat Burt:

Last year, the so-called “residentialists” (Karen, Tom, and Eric) supported Burt for vice mayor and forgot about Greg Schmid, who supported them so strongly in the campaign. At the same time last year, Berman, Kniss, Scharff, and Wolbach supported Schmid for Vice Mayor, despite perceived ideological political and differences. (They gave him a chance after his friends stabbed him in the back, but he was an ineffective vice mayor, so now they went with pragmatism.) Now Cheryl and her “residentialist” allies cry foul when people they don’t like do the same thing their friends did just a year ago. Short memories and hypocrisy, or am I missing something?

I remember noticing that and wondering; maybe the pro-developer four merely knew that Schmid would win and switched their votes to cloak their actual ideology — they didn’t support Schmid they were just mocking him or being sly. But despite being occassionally called a residentialist, or giving lip service to some residents’ concern, Burt is consistently pro-developer and really does not care about you and me.  And comparing our situation to something as obscure as Turkey is pulling my punches.

3 or *: I was starting to think about the real estate transactions published each week or so in two or our local “real estate rags”. I am curious to track how many houses are flipped, that is sold shortly after being bought. I noticed that of the four posted in today’s paper (the other one, the one with no name), 3 of 4 were “last sale” since 2010. I am guessing that close to half of sales are by sellers who were buyers within five previous years, which to my mind is flipping. (Or what is the historical baseline). A secondary point, and I have no idea the signficance is that the surnames in these small sample set four cases were: Gu, Lee, Gao and Zhang. (YuanZhang as compared to zugzwang the German word which I translate as “compelled to move” which is chess not home location. Which could yield “Zugzwang w. YuanZhang” as a quickie Plasty post, but I digress.

4. Twelve hours earlier, veteran reporter G. Sheyner had written a preview as if he expected Vice Mayor Schmid to succeed Holman:

Palo Alto will have a new mayor tonight and, if tradition holds, the annual honor will go to a soft-spoken, data-hungry economist with a long record of skepticism and dissent when it comes to new developments.

5. Its a read hearing (and pointless to a point beyond the consonance which it fits to a “T”) but Tomsula was a lousy coach who just happened to be in the right place at the right time to go 5-11 make $14 M and pass on into obscurity; to me this sounds condescending: We all know he is a man of high character, and his contributions on the field and in our community have always been greatly appreciated. This entire organization is proud and grateful to have worked so closely alongside Jimmy. We all wish him and his family great success in the future.” That’s the owner of the Niners on their former head coach, Jim Tomsula. Obscure and soft-padded football analogies pass muster (brad?) with the censors more than obscure and faintly snarky political tropes; I also noted in a discarded copy left at Coupa the Times P1 article on The U.S. (that’s us) our quandary over Iran and Saudi; that would be a more timely comparison to Developers w. Residentialists although I haven’t quite worked out the form. Meanwhile while chatting up Faith Bell (I saw her on tv last night in her tribute to Karen) I remembered that I intended to write something about Lyfe and GM and “smart homes” and Philip K. Dick”: “Do Smarthomes dream of electric sheep?” but have totally not recall. (I’m still processing three layers or tranches of Michael Lewis: the reported and real news, the book, the movie, “The Big Short” or bad loans, bonds of such, and CDOs of such.

6. the nut graph of a post about Pat Burt would be to succintly describe how in 2012 after I posted somewhere a distrust of his account of the Arrillaga Towers 27 University announcement, he got in my face a bit at Printers Ink, which I call “bullying” and in fact as the Grand Jury report notes, indeed Pat Burt met with John Arrillaga in secret six months prior, so there was indeed something funny about his “we’re taking the lead here” bit. And I doubt I am the only person who thinks of Pat Burt as a bully. Gives new meaning to the term “bully pulpit”. I should post that. {Edit to add, the next day: The GJR does not to my memory list which council members met with John Arrillaga or his staff secretly, only that enough of these meetings went on that it comprised a “serial meeting” and therefore was contrary to policy and the Brown Act — the number may have been as few as 4 and not as many as 9, although I also don’t recall any council members saying he or she did not meet with Arrillaga. So I should re-check the record or maybe ask Burt if he met with A. But he was certainly defensive about this, and I say, bullying. MW}{{Ok, GS of the PAW in 11/12 said that groups of two or three council members twice met with Arrillaga on the project, and said YY and LK did not — recusing — while KH and Schmid definitely did, but it does not say Pat did or did not, only that he went on record saying that the public benefit was worth at least “$100 million” so he probably did. Or do tell}}

7. Greg Schmid is by far the most respected person on that dias. Not sure what to make of the outcome. Hard to see how the horse trading was done within Brown Act. Ok, now I’m confused. I wrote that sentence on GS’s article last night, while watching the Warriors game and not the council meeting (but people texted me so I had my handheld out). But when I got to add another comment (” Huzzah for the new bully pulpit”) I am semi-censored again. Is the difference they censor from my computer and not from my handheld? Bizarre.

8 or “pointy thingy” or ^  which reminds that when the Weekly wrote about Berman announcing his run for Assembly, the Weekly deleted three separate comments I made, and I don’t think I backed those up. (I often copy my comments to my desktop; in this case I don’t recall quite what I said, unless I pointed out how favorable the Weekly was to the point of an imbalance when Berman ran for Council, a race I was also in). (actually, this paragraph has since been deleted from the weekly, about Bill Johnson’s weak and dubious rationalization of censoring my comments, at the time).

Posted in Plato's Republic, this blue marble | Tagged | Leave a comment

‘Ch-changes’ v. ch-ching

I posted a couple hours earlier today –oh, by the way, Happy New Year 2016 to all you loyal Plastic Altoids — to a wordpress blog, a post from a couple years ago, about Bowie Bonds, the asset-backed security from 1997 or so that raised $55 m for either David Bowie, his manager, a guy named David Pullman or Prudential that served as an advance on his next record deal or basically just a plug for the Wall Street way (which a short time later, gave us “Too Big to Fail” which was the loss of 500 Billion also known as half a Trillion{I think I mean 5 Trillion -ed}). The blog was by a big Bowie fan who also is a former Wall Street guy (compared to me, a former small time music manager, who is medium cool into Bowie, and have no even indirect connection to Bowie — I dated a girl once, who recognized him in a cameo in an obscure British flick, was it “Brimstone and Treacle”?.
I was reading Michael Lewis “The Big Short” on at the very bottom of page 98 (of 290) it said “asset-backed” and that sent me sussing about ol’ David. And then posting on this guy’s blog. And now I’m at page 128 i.e. 30 pages later — and this is basically all I accomplished today, beyond fetching Chinese food for lunch and then, with Terry, making a great pasta with meat sauce dinner — all of a sudden I am worried that my ideas are so ludicrous that they were de-posted. Then the headline came to me so why not post here?!

Posted in “filthy lucre”. Tagged “bowie bonds” “michael lewis” “the big short” “david bowie”

The thing that came to mind but I did not say is that around the time of Bowie Bonds the music industry had made a sea change, more subtle than what people always say about Napster crushing the major labels: around 1999 the major labels made more money on publishing than on record sales; prices soared and stayed high for things like licensing a classic song or a performance by a classic act to television and movies; they made more money and still do on their catalog than new artists. They have not completely abandanoned new artists, it’s just less of the business model. And the major labels still sell about 80 percent of the biz (which was the variable I always tracked, or rooted against; I am indie).

I checked and other people did speculate and usually dismiss that there is some connection between Bowie Bonds and Too Big to Fail. Not much of a connection,it just made me think. And yes the blogger who is or was a wall st guy writes about music better than I understand the market.

The blog is called “Pushing Ahead of the Dame” by Chris O’Leary I think (the reference eludes me) and here is what I wrote:

I found my way to this because “securitization” is mentioned on page 98 of Michael Lewis “The Big Short”. Is the performance of the underlying asset that important to the ” bond”?
Arguably this is like Bowie accepting $55m to stump for Wall Street period.
I wish I could have shorted the ability of Bowie to sell $55m in records over the last decade.
His touring should have been independent of his publishing and unit sales so the deal would not be contingent on his playing so many shows.

edit to add: there’s also a news to me act called Chairlift with a song “ch-ching”

and 1: Liza Jane, accordng to O’Leary book, the first song put out by Bowie, but also perhaps a cover, by dale hawkings but not either the Nina Simone or Vince Gill thingies. Wranglers?

 

edit to add, Monday, Jan. 11- the blogger Wedge (craig m) sends word that Bowie has succumbed to cancer.

Posted in filthy lucre | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Washington Huskies’ ‘Statue of Lenin’ play in Dallas Bowl

_20151226_115318

Browning to Gaskin for first down gain

IMG_20151226_114615565_HDR.jpg

On their first touchdown drive in the Dallas Bowl Saturday, Washington Huskies football executed a version of the famous “Statue of Liberty” play, but with the quarterback faking pass and handing off to runner behind his back. Could coach Peterson and crew be influenced by the Ballard Seattle statue of Lenin, the communist leader??

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wobbly twang,fuzztone bark and or molten gnarl or growl

IMG_20151224_130934629

Garchik band ye olde as described or their sounds rather by chinen of the Sunday Times

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I shit you not (Shinola plug, redux)

William Eggleston: UNTITLED (MEMPHIS), 1970,

Posted in art, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment